Twenty questions across four lenses. Fifteen minutes. You'll get a multi-axis read on where the team is solid and where the gaps actually are — not a single vanity score. The same four-lens framework we use on our own systems.
Most engineering "health checks" measure one thing — deploy frequency, or NPS, or velocity — and miss everything else. A team can ship daily and still have a compliance gap that ends a deal. A team can have great morale and zero ability to roll back. We score four lenses separately so you can see the shape of the risk, not just the average.
Self-reported, by design. This diagnostic is attestation — your honest read of your own organization — and that's a real signal: it starts the right conversation, and it's free because honesty does most of the work. What attestation can't do is verify itself. That's observation — first and mostly the human kind: being in the room while work happens, watching who speaks, who defers, and what goes unsaid. No system reveals that layer, and it's usually where the gap between the deck and delivery lives. Toolchain evidence can round out the picture where it's useful. An engagement picks up there, if the result warrants one. Trust the self-read; verify in the room.
Answer the questions above — your scores will appear here as you go. The full read renders once each lens has at least one answer.
30 minutes, free, no slides. Send us your scores or just walk us through the worst lens — we'll talk through what's actually fixable in the next 90 days and what needs senior technical leadership in the room.
Book a Discovery Call →