What's on your mind? →

How to take it.

For each question, pick the option that's most honest about your organization today — not the model described in the deck, not the one the transformation is working toward. Answer from what you'd see walking the floor, not what was attested in the steering committee. There are no good or bad scores; there are honest ones.

Self-reported, by design. This diagnostic is attestation — your honest read of your own organization — and that's a real signal: it starts the right conversation, and it's free because honesty does most of the work. What attestation can't do is verify itself. That's observation — first and mostly the human kind: being in the room while work happens, watching who speaks, who defers, and what goes unsaid. No system reveals that layer, and it's usually where the gap between the deck and delivery lives. Toolchain evidence can round out the picture where it's useful. An engagement picks up there, if the result warrants one. Trust the self-read; verify in the room.

Yes — consistently true.Real, not aspirational. With recent examples to back it up.
Partial.Sometimes; depends on the situation or the person.
No.Honest answer is no, even if we'd like it to be yes.
Doesn't apply.Genuinely not relevant to our organization's stage or shape.

Answer the questions above — your operating model report renders here once you're done.

Got the result. Now what?

If the read surfaced real gaps, the next step is Plan: we walk the job with the people who do it — role audit, decision-rights gaps, bottlenecks — and agree the one thing worth fixing first, from someone who designed and ran this at Fortune 250 scale alongside McKinsey. No minimum term, and it runs straight into Build once the target is clear. Not sure it's the right starting point? A 30-minute call sorts it.

See how Plan works →

The path: this health check → assessment (the ranked 90-day plan) → Implementation or Operating Model Build (the changes go live).

Or book a 30-minute call →